Daughter-in-Law Can’t Be Ousted From House on the basis of Summary Proceedings under Senior Citizens Act, All HC Quashes Eviction Order
Daughter-in-Law Can’t Be Ousted From House on the basis of Summary Proceedings under Senior Citizens Act, All HC Quashes Eviction Order
The court said that the order of the SDM is in violation of the decision of the Supreme Court in the case of S. Vanitha vs. Deputy Commissioner, Bengaluru Urban District and Other. This Judgment was given by a Single Judge bench of Justice Vivek Chaudhary on the petition of the daughter-in-law. (Smt. Khusboo Shkula vs District Magistrate Lucknow and Others).
On July 14, 2021, the SDM had ordered the daughter-in-law to vacate the house located in Gomti Nagar, on the petition of her father-in-law. The petition was filed under the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007.
The court said that on November 6, 2019, the Special Judicial Magistrate, Lucknow on the application filed under the Domestic Violence Act ordered that the daughter-in-law shall not be removed from the said house. The court found that the mother-in-law lives in Veer Nagar, Udayganj. The petitioner also lived with her husband and mother-in-law. But due to family dispute, she and her husband started living in Vishal Khand.
Also Read
- Magistrate Meeting a Political Leader in his Officer Can’t be a Ground to Transfer Case: Allahabad HC
- Delhi HC opines that an SDM committed contempt for notifying the family of an interfaith couple
- Senior Citizens have Right to Property, Whereas son and daughter-in-law are licensees at best
- HC fines a Mother-in-law Rs 10000 for filing a frivolous case against her daughter-in-law
- [498A] Taunting Daughter-in-Law is Part of Married Life, Can’t be a Ground to Refuse Anticipatory Bail
They also had a child in 2015, however, her husband died in 2019. The petitioner said that since the death of her husband, her in-laws are harassing her. They wanted to remove her from the house.
Eventually, she was made homeless after the order of the SDM. Now she and her child don’t have a roof over their heads.
The court referring to the Judgment of Supreme Court in the case of S. Vanitha vs. Deputy Commissioner, Bengaluru Urban District and Other observed that:
It stands settled that both the Acts i.e. Senior Citizens, Act, 2007 and PWDV Act, 2005 are to be read simultaneously and a wife cannot be ousted from her matrimonial home on the basis of the summary proceedings under the Senior Citizens Act, 2007. In the present case, the Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Sadar, Lucknow has passed the order in violation of the law settled by the Supreme Court by directing eviction of the petitioner under the provisions of Senior Citizens Act, 2007.
Comment / Reply From
You May Also Like
Popular Posts
Vote / Poll
Would you be interested in providing content for this newsletter?
Newsletter
Subscribe to our mailing list to get the new updates!